首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of formability and fracture of pure titanium in incremental sheet forming
【2h】

Evaluation of formability and fracture of pure titanium in incremental sheet forming

机译:增量板材成形中纯钛的成形性和断裂性评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A forming limit diagram (FLD) is commonly used as a useful means for characterizing the formability of sheet metal forming processes. In this study, the Nakajima test was used to construct the forming limit curve at necking (FLCN) and fracture (FLCF). The results of the FLCF are compared with incremental sheet forming (ISF) to evaluate the ability of the Nakajima test to describe the fracture in ISF. Tests were carried to construct the forming limit diagram at necking and fracture to cover the strain states from uniaxial tension to equi-biaxial tension with different stress triaxialities - from 0.33 for uniaxial tension to 0.67 for equi-biaxial tension. Due to the fact that the Gurson–Tvergaard- Needleman (GTN) model can be used to capture fracture occurrence at high stress triaxiality, and the shear modified GTN model (Nahshon-Hutchinson’s shear mechanism) was developed to predict the fracture at zero stress or even negative stress triaxiality, the original GTN model and shear modified GTN model may be not suitable to predict the fracture in all samples of the Nakajima test as some samples are deformed under moderate stress triaxiality. In this study, the fractures are compared using either the original GTN model, shear modified GTN model or Nielsen-Tvergaard model with regard to stress triaxiality. To validate the ability of these models, and to assess which model is more accurate in predicting the fracture with different stress triaxialities, finite element (FE) simulations of the Nakajima test were compared with an experimental results to evaluate the applicability of the Nakajima test to characterise the fracture from ISF. The experimental and FE results showed that the shear modified GTN model could predict the fracture accurately with samples under uniaxial tension condition due to low stress triaxiality and that the original model is suitable for an equi-biaxial strain state (high stress triaxiality), whereas the stress triaxiality modified GTN model should be considered for samples which have moderate stress triaxiality (from plain strain to biaxial strain). The numerical and experimental FLCF of pure titanium from the Nakajima test showed good agreement with the experimental and numerical results of ISF.
机译:成形极限图(FLD)通常用作表征钣金成形过程可成形性的有用手段。在这项研究中,中岛检验被用来构建颈缩(FLCN)和断裂(FLCF)的成形极限曲线。将FLCF的结果与增量板成形(ISF)进行比较,以评估Nakajima试验描述ISF裂缝的能力。进行了测试以构建在颈缩和断裂处的成形极限图,以涵盖从单轴拉伸到具有不同应力三轴性的等双轴拉伸的应变状态-从单轴拉伸的0.33到等双轴拉伸的0.67。由于可以使用Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman(GTN)模型来捕获高应力三轴性下的裂缝,因此开发了剪切修正GTN模型(Nahshon-Hutchinson的剪切机制)来预测零应力或零应力下的裂缝。即使是负应力三轴性,由于某些样品在中等应力三轴性的作用下变形,原始的GTN模型和剪切修正的GTN模型可能也不适合预测中岛试验所有样品的断裂。在这项研究中,使用原始GTN模型,剪切修正GTN模型或Nielsen-Tvergaard模型对裂缝的三轴应力进行了比较。为了验证这些模型的能力,并评估哪种模型更准确地预测具有不同应力三轴性的裂缝,将中岛试验的有限元(FE)模拟与实验结果进行了比较,以评估中岛试验在以下条件下的适用性:从ISF表征裂缝。实验和有限元分析结果表明,由于低应力三轴性,剪切修正的GTN模型可以在单轴拉伸条件下准确预测样品的断裂,并且原始模型适用于等双轴应变状态(高应力三轴性),而对于具有中等应力三轴性(从平应变到双轴应变)的样品,应考虑使用应力三轴性修改的GTN模型。 Nakajima试验得出的纯钛的FLCF数值和实验结果与ISF的数值实验结果吻合良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号